Viking Warrior had boobs!

Home Forums General Discussion Viking Warrior had boobs!

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Julieanne Porter 1 week, 3 days ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #35711

    Emma Howard
    Participant

    Probably should have used the introductions section for my first post but I figured this is as good an introduction as any.

    I apologise if this has already been posted, I did look but I couldnt see it, albeit that I am still blindly stumbling around the forums like a blindly stumbling thing.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/viking-warrior-woman-female-soldier-sweden-discovery-a7937391.html

    Swedish scientists have revealed that the body of a Viking warrior long presumed to be male is, in fact, female.

    A team of researchers from Stockholm University conducted a DNA analysis of the skeleton and confirmed that it belonged to a woman. The 10th-century skeleton, the researchers concluded, is the first confirmed female high-ranking Viking warrior.

    Scientists had long assumed that the skeleton was male – despite early indications that she may have been female – largely because of the status symbols buried alongside her.

    1000-year-old Viking fortress uncovered in Denmark
    Early archaeologists uncovered a sword, an axe, a spear, armour-piercing arrows, a battle knife, two shields, and two horses in the grave, signifying the buried individual’s status of as a “professional warrior”. A set of gaming pieces found in the grave indicates the individual’s “knowledge of tactics and strategy” and role as a high-ranking officer, the scientists said.

    Because of this – and because no such high-ranking female Viking has been discovered before – most researchers assumed the body was male. When early analyses indicated the body was female, some suggested that the objects buried alongside her belonged to someone else.

    “This type of reasoning takes away the agency of the buried female,” the researchers write. “As long as the sex is male, the weaponry in the grave not only belong to the interred but also reflects his status as warrior, whereas a female sex has raised doubts.”

    To quash those doubts, the researchers took a DNA sample from the skeleton’s arm and tooth. The sample revealed a lack of Y chromosomes, signalling that the individual was female. The scientists also noted that the skeleton’s bones were “thin, slender and gracile” like a woman’s, further supporting their conclusions.

    The skeleton was first discovered in the 1880s in the Swedish town of Birka. The city is located on the on the island of Björkö, and was an important trading centre for Vikings. The area now contains more than 3,000 Viking graves.

    These latest findings, the researchers write, “provide a new understanding of the Viking society, the social constructions and also norms in the Viking Age.”

    “Our results – that the high-status grave Bj 581 on Birka was the burial of a high ranking female Viking warrior – suggest that women, indeed, were able to be full members of male dominated spheres,” they conclude.

    I love the discussions that Jamie has about women’s involvement in history, so this jumped out at me. More food for the “there were women in the shield wall” argument. Bring on the aneurisms.

    • This topic was modified 1 week, 3 days ago by  Emma Howard.
  • #35725

    Julieanne Porter
    Participant

    I was only listening to episode 215 last week which mentioned the possibility of women serving on a shield wall. Then this evidence has come up. Fascinating stuff. Looks like a lot of archaeology and history is going to need revision. *grins*

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

jQuery('.testimonials-widget-testimonials17')